Milton Friedman (Milton Friedman) of the speech

 Milton. Friedman (Milton Friedman) speech speech
Date: March 21, 1985
specified by the organizers today's theme is I'm sure all of you here must have a substantial proportion of the Nobel Prize in Economics on how to get this kind of problem, than for me how to be more interested in the process of economic scholars. Therefore, as empirical research scientists, I decided to From a statistical point of view,UGG boots cheap, to explore how an economist should do to get the Nobel Prize.
>>> attack the three elements of prize may
We all know that economics prize, awarded something more recent It is the Swedish central bank in 1968 to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the establishment set up. so far (1985), a total of 22 winners, none of which were women. So it seems from the previous example, if you want to be a promise Bell Prize Laureates, the most important point is that being male. are here to point out that there has been no female winner, the Swedish Nobel Committee should not male chauvinism. I also believe that the economics profession almost unanimously agreed, During this period, possibly only one female candidate in full compliance with accreditation standards related to the British economist mm she is Mrs. Robinson, but she died a few years ago. why did not the Nobel Committee awarded her the title , not about sex discrimination, but may reflect a bias exists. economists here today, the bias should know what I mean.
The second condition is .22 bits be a U.S. citizen Award people, 12 from the United States, four from Britain, two from Sweden, the other four were from four other countries. But further analysis, this reasoning is not as clear as before, because the United States The population is more than 3 times the UK, but the number of people winning only 3 times the UK, so from the basis of the average, the UK's award-winning documentary better.
The third condition, at least for me is the most interesting results. in 12 award-winning American economist, there are nine not educated in the University of Chicago, is taught in this book. So, we went up to Chicago. In addition to the nine American Economic home, there is also a winner Hayek taught at the University of Chicago for ten years. but in my classified inside,UGG shoes, he is Austrian and not American. laureate in economics, statistics related only to the This date, which I also give you for possible future winner of the recommendations.
the process of accepting the Nobel Prize, the most memorable was 12 early in the week to accept the award in Sweden. My wife and I feeling is awarded the Nobel Prize in the process, it seems that the Swedes have put aside all the work, concentrate on the Nobel Prize ceremony. going into dinner or related activities, it is overwhelmed. that week the culmination of the whole event was a dinner and dance, each winners of the audience should be made to have a little drunk within three minutes of speech. I think you might want to listen to my speech in the 1976. Here, I will be opening and closing blessings which removed the middle of the main body of the statement is as follows:
Prize, the Swedish central bank in 1968 to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the establishment began to set up. I must admit, this background does give me some conflict of interest. because you may know, according to my research in monetary theory results I think that the central bank to replace the function of the computer instead of better, simply set the quantity of money on the computer to have a stable growth rate can be. but for me personally as well as a small group of fellow economists to be carefully selected to said the good news is, my conclusion was not accepted mm or today is not the Swedish central bank to donate the establishment at the moment I had the honor won the award. Maybe from here you can come out of: blessing in disguise, a blessing in disguise? I do not know if they are really so, but I think some economists may be so.
winning mood though happy, it must be admitted that in the past eight weeks, I have realized that the world is not only no free lunch, White did not get the award. Since winning the Nobel Prize is the world's attention, it was announced winners of various incurable diseases as soon as the experts, attracting worldwide magazines, television reporters and photographers swarmed . I asked the question can be said that everything from how to treat the common cold, to the letter signed by President Kennedy to the market price. be so concerned about, of course, very flattered, but also inevitably lead to the heart of complacency. I think that things outside of our professional interference Nobel Prize winner, of course, under pain need to point out errors, but those of us on the over-inflated ego Laureate should also be cautious about. I own areas of expertise are out of the antidote is to establish more such awards. However, to replace the successful products such as the Nobel Prize, I am afraid is not easy. As a result, I think those of us who self-expansion may continue for a long time!